BM News Feed
Actress Jurnee Smollett is currently facing renewed legal challenges following her divorce from musician Josiah Bell, despite already having provided significant financial support. Reports indicate that Smollett has paid close to one million dollars to her former husband and continues to contribute approximately $7,000 per month in child support. However, Bell is now seeking additional financial compensation, extending the legal dispute well beyond the original divorce settlement.
Smollett and Bell’s marriage officially ended in 2021 after ten years together. At the time, the divorce brought closure to their relationship, with financial agreements put in place to support their child and ensure fairness between both parties. Despite this, Bell has returned to court requesting access to additional assets, specifically targeting Smollett’s retirement accounts.
According to recent filings, Bell is seeking half of Smollett’s retirement savings, arguing that her 401(k) and pension funds should be considered community property. This claim has sparked debate, as Smollett’s career and earnings history are highly unique compared to most working professionals. The actress has been active in the entertainment industry since early childhood, long before her marriage to Bell began.
Smollett reportedly began acting at just five years old and has been contributing to industry-related retirement plans for decades. Sources state that she has maintained a 401(k) and a Screen Actors Guild (SAG) pension since she was very young, well before entering adulthood and years prior to her marriage. These long-standing accounts are now at the center of the dispute, as questions arise over which portions, if any, should be classified as shared marital assets.
Legal experts note that cases involving child actors often introduce added complexity when it comes to asset division. Earnings accumulated before marriage are typically considered separate property, while funds acquired during the marriage may be subject to division. Determining how much of Smollett’s retirement savings falls into each category could require detailed financial analysis and documentation spanning several decades.
Despite the ongoing dispute, Smollett has remained focused on her career and her role as a parent. She continues to work actively in film and television, maintaining a steady presence in the industry while navigating the legal process privately. Supporters have noted her longstanding commitment to her craft and her financial responsibilities, emphasizing the significant contributions she has already made.
As the case moves forward, the court will ultimately determine how Smollett’s retirement assets should be classified and whether Bell is entitled to any portion of them. The situation highlights the complexities that can arise in high-profile divorces, especially when one partner’s career spans a lifetime. For now, the matter remains unresolved, with both parties awaiting a legal decision that will bring final clarity to the dispute.
